When people that are historically important reach the end of their lives depending on why they grew to become important will matter of course in how we react to this time. For the man that is known as Nelson Mandela it will be a very sad time for the people of his country and the world. Mandela joined the African National Congress in1942. This was the beginnings of the Anti-Apartheid movement. For 20 years, Mandela directed peaceful, nonviolent acts of defiance against the South African government and its racist policies, including the 1952 Defiance Campaign and the 1955 Congress of the People. He founded the law firm Mandela and Tambo, partnering with Oliver Tambo, a brilliant student he'd met while attending Fort Hare. The law firm provided free and low-cost legal counsel to unrepresented blacks. Mandela helped to free his people from the oppression of the British/white culture that had held them back for so very long. With the freedom that we on the most part take for granted in this day and age it is almost hard to relate to what these people suffered through. Nelson Mandela was put in prison for 20 years. And released in February of 1990 and then elected president of the National African Congress in 1991. He continued to negotiate with President FW De Klerk and in 1993 they were both awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for their parts in dismantling apartheid. On April 27, 1994 South Africa held its first ever democratic elections. At the age of 77 Nelson Mandela was elected as the first Black President of his country on May 10, 1994. It is hard in our country to believe that within our lifetimes that any country would have its first democratic election. We have seen a lot more do just this now in the Middle East and the people of their countries in somewhat peaceful ways move to democracy and elections that allow the people to have their say about who they want in office and running their countries. Then we come to Syria. A war torn country that has the Soviet Union backing them and providing them with the materials of war. The Soviet Union could make things easier on the world if they were to ask that the leader step down and allow for a peaceful transition to democratic state and allow for the people to elect their leader. I wish for those people to have the freedom that we are allowed in the United States and the peaceful lives we get to live. When elections are held in these countries we cannot control what kinds of parties these people represent just as the party that wins is up to the voters here. We can only hope that if the people do not like whom they elected that there will be a peaceful transition of power to the next choice. Our lives here have been able to be peaceful for some time and the growth we have had has been good for the most part. People in other countries that have bombs and wars going on every day would love to come and live in our peaceful nation. I cannot understand how a people that love peace as very much as we do could enter into war so easily. It would seem that we think it is ok for it to happen as long as it is somewhere else. We should not accept this behavior for ourselves or other countries. Peace should be what we want for the entire world. Maybe if we could stay out of wars for a while we just might learn how to live without the war machine that costs us so very much in money and human lives. This world needs more men like Nelson Mandela not less.
The one thing I NEVER could have anticipated from the GOP, is how deeply committed they are to making racial bigotry, white entitlement, and supposedly blind/subconscious bias a central element of their "brand."Yes, I knew the racist elements were there, just under the surface. But basic math shows the futility of continued antagonism and hegemonic marginalization of non-whites and women. You JUST CAN'T WIN with such a strategy.So what do they do in the face of futile math? They double down on the racism and bigotry?! That tells me something important, perhaps the most important thing we could ever learn about far right Republicans, ever ever ever:It's in their (figurative) party DNA. They can't purge bigotry and racist assumptions from the party because it is the CORE MOTIVATING FACTOR of the party. That's a grim assessment. But I mean, really, KKK et. al. have maintained a half-life underground for many years. BIGOTS HAVE LEARNED TO HIDE. But the GOP can't, even to their own mathematical downfall. Even to the point that is it like watching a national political party commit hari kari right before your eyes.
Wow. Just let that sink in for a second.
A TRUE PARADOX! I mean, really. Most would agree the GOP is a party that tilts toward top-down authoritarianism. If it has a "god" in the non-religious-professing sense, that "god" is power and authority. And, it stands to reason, even their conception of the religious-professing-god is a patriarchal holder of absolute power and authority, top-down, don't ask questions, disobey, go straight to hell. So they worship the holders of the greatest power and authority (religious, secular, financial, political), apparently genuflecting in some postmodern version of the Victorian Great Chain of Being;they covet power and authority, worship that "us vs. them" Othering that a deeply-held sense of entitlement brings;and deliberately and subconsciously seek to marginalize, bully, subdue, or merely diminish those designated as "Other"
EVEN TO THEIR OWN DETRIMENT!
That's where the paradox comes in. Power-worship, and the entitled arrogance of power-wielding, requires the continued ability to retain that power. Yet their need to continually assert that entitled arrogance and bigotry. This virtually guarantees that they will losethe political power they deem to hold so dear. I feel this is a precedent for this kind of blindness and self-sabotage. Where a so-called "power group" was so invested in its own cultures of power, how "big" it makes them feel, in other words that the harder it hung on to its claims of great superiority and power, the more they have alienated all of those around them, sharing the broader culture and social contracts? Is this the inevitable downfall of fascists and strongmen? That they effectively poison their own wells? I guess the greatest historical precedent I can think of is the English royality from the time of the First and Second Estates. Somehow, some people came to hold (steal or earn) great power or wealth, sufficient to lay claim to great estates, servants, chattal, serfs in an anarchic or feudal time (castles, moats, if you will). They loved the power and wealth so very much, they deemed themselves a special class, with special bloodlines, in order to continue to consolidate and perpetuate their specialness and when an alternate economic system appeared on the scene (rise of an independent merchant class, guilds, etc.) with its own commodities and trading system that didn't automatically defer to the power and value system of the "lords," they were caught off guard. Sure, some probably adapted. But the affectations and assumptions of that class boxed many of them into a comfortable assumption that their entitlement to power and wealth were inherent. As more and more of them became "land rich" but "cash poor.
While today's GOP is certainly affiliated with many people who have many large estates, by and large, all they can really lay claim to for superiority is the color of their skin, their gender, their exclusions and inclusions, which grow more and more hollow every day. Yet, instead of adapting, they hold on to the thing, power and entitlement, and the arrogant and bigoted expressions thereof, that will make them LOSE that very power and entitlement most quickly! Tone-deafness that doesn't even comprehend how tone deaf it is. Wake up and smell the coffee GOP your bigotry is going to take you down.